4 Comments

Great article G!

Funny how Marks has said that the "high risk = high reward" hypothesis makes no sense. I'm sure he's aware of study. Because clearly it doesn't hold a candle to current research.

The research on returns by market cap also make a lot of sense. I have a lot of small caps in my PF, and I'm fully aware and accept the volatility that accompanies it. But I feel this gives me an edge in terms of return that I wouldn't be able to get from holding large caps.

Its pretty scary how difficult it is to keep up a high earnings growth! This lends credence to if you find something that can outperform, you'd better hold onto it for dear life. You may have a once in a lifetime winner on your hands.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you very much! All very valid points my friends. I was quite surprised with the first one because it plainly contradicts all finance theory. On the second one I agree with you actually and I believe these kinds of studies support your investment philosophy, which is great to know. On the last one, I was extremely surprised. I wasn't expecting 10% growth to be that unsustainable.

Expand full comment

Thanks Giuliano!

If anyone is interested in learning more I offer a free chapter when signing up for my Substack, and you can find the book here: https://www.amazon.com/Low-Risk-Rules-Preservation-Manifesto/dp/1774581744/

I'd be happy to discuss offline as well.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for spreading the word on such interesting research!

Expand full comment